In this blog post I want to go through the analysis pipeline of layer-dependent VASO.
I will go through the all the analysis steps that need to be done to go from raw data from the scanner to final layer profiles. The entire thing will take about 30 min (10 min analysis and 20 min explaining and browsing through data).
1.) The example data
I use an example dataset from this study. It is a 12 min finger tapping experiment covering a small FOV of the right motor cortex.
The imaging parameters are:
- 0.74×0.74×1.25 mm
- TR = 1.5 s (For BOLD and VASO each), resulting in effective resolution of 3s.
- The time series consists of an interleaved acquisition of images with and without blood nulling.
- 10 slices
- remaining parameters can be seen at this summary pdf
- The tapping task was alternating between 30 sec of rest and 30 sec or tapping using this psychopy program.
- The FOV is double tilted
2.) Motion correction
- A manual mask is defined to avoid faulty motion estimation due to variable distortions outside the FOV.
- The non-steady-state images (the first four time points) are overwritten with steady-state images.
- The SS-SI VASO sequence acquires images with and without blood nulling interleaved (see also this blog post). Thus, the motion correction is applied separately for BOLD and VASO.
- Ideally, the motion parameters should be very similar for BOLD and VASO. This needs to be checked manually every time.
If you don’t want to use SPM because of potential reluctance or license issues when using matlab, there is also an AFNI version of motion correction here (note that the results of AFNI motion correction are not as ‘crisp’ as the SPM result).
3.) BOLD correction and contrast combination
- As explained in previous blog posts (see this blog post), there is a T2*-weighting in any EPI readout. Thus, the image with blood nulling is not solely containing VASO contrast. It also has some unwanted BOLD contamination that can counteract the negative VASO contrast. This BOLD contamination needs to be corrected for. E.g. with a division of the blood-nulled image with the not-nulled BOLD image.
- Since the blood-nulled and not-nulled image are acquired interleaved, the time series are temporally upsampled (in afni) and shifted with respect to each other, such that the respective contrasts refer to the same point in time.
- The division happens in the LAYNII program
-trialBOCOcommand averages all the 12 trials together.
- Since VASO has an inherent T1-weighting included, the time series can also be evaluated to provide a T1-weighted MP2RAGE-like contrast as an anatomical reference in EPI space.
4.) Quality measures
- Conventional quality measured are also estimated:
- tSNR: As measure of signal stability
- MEAN can depict artifacts that disappear in the noise level for single TR imaged
- Skew and kurtosis show how Gausian the noise distribution is. When the signal is not Gausian, it could be an indication of EPI ghosting or phase inconsistency artefacts.
- Auto-correlation can also be valuable e.g. during strong head motion.
5.) Functional activity
- One way to estimate the signal change is to just subtract the signal during activity with the signal during rest.
- Another way is to use a GLM implemented in all the mayor software packages.
The layering has been previously already described in this blog post.
- The first step is to upscale the data to allow smooth layers
- Then the borderlines can be drawn (e.g. in Fsleyes)
- The layers can then be calculated with
All LAYNII program executions are tested for version v.1.5.6 and will probably work for later versions too.